Production-grade web applications, AI agents, and the automation around them — built to your spec, delivered in two-week sprints, and yours to keep when we're done.
Discuss your projectMost development engagements get stuck in the same loop: a sales team scopes optimistically, a junior engineer builds something different from what you described, and three months later you're paying for change orders to fix the gaps. We work differently.
Every project here is senior-led from kickoff to handoff. The same person who scopes your build is the one writing the code. There's no translation layer, no offshore handoff, no half-trained team-member who needs the requirements re-explained. This is what makes a small operation actually faster than a bigger one — fewer moving parts, fewer dropped balls.
A growing slice of the work we do is building production-grade AI agents for clients who want to move beyond chatbots into systems that actually do things. Not demos — software that runs in your environment, talks to your data, and takes action.
The current generation of language models makes it possible to build software that reasons, remembers, and adapts in ways that weren't realistic a couple of years ago. But there's a wide gap between a prototype that looks impressive in a demo and an agent that's reliable enough to put in front of customers or internal stakeholders. Closing that gap is craft work — and it's where most off-the-shelf solutions fall over.
We use modern AI development tooling internally to move fast — but what we ship is yours, runs on your infrastructure, and doesn't depend on any vendor lock-in we can't justify. If a workflow can be solved with a simpler tool, we'll tell you that too.
A lot of the highest-leverage work isn't a brand-new app — it's removing the manual work between the systems you already have. The export-from-one-tool, the manual reconciliation, the spreadsheet someone "owns" but nobody understands. These are exactly the problems that pay back fastest when properly automated.
Where AWS-native services (Lambda, Step Functions, EventBridge) fit the volume or compliance needs, we use them; where a lighter tool like Zapier or Make is genuinely better, we use that. The choice is always driven by what your team can maintain after we leave.
A focused session to understand the problem, the stakeholders, and the constraints. You get a written proposal with a fixed price (or capped hourly), a realistic timeline, and crisp deliverables.
Two-week sprints with working software at the end of each one. Weekly 30-minute check-ins so nothing drifts and you're never surprised by what's been built.
Documentation, source code in your repo, deployment configured in your cloud account. Optional ongoing support retainer if you want one — but never a lock-in.
For most well-scoped projects, fixed-price by milestone. You pay when each deliverable lands, not on a clock. For projects where the scope genuinely can't be locked down upfront — research-heavy work, early-stage product exploration, ongoing iteration — we use a capped weekly or monthly retainer with full transparency on hours.
The first conversation is always free. If the project's not a fit, I'll tell you that too, and where possible point you toward someone who is.
Most development engagements naturally touch one of these too.
Not sure what to build yet, or whether to build at all? Advisory engagements help you decide before you commit budget.
Explore advisory →Run a Shopify or WooCommerce store? Get a free audit of your storefront — every revenue leak found, explained, and fixed.
Get a free audit →Tell me what you're working on. First conversation is free, scope-out is written, and you'll know within a week whether it makes sense to move forward.